We should only use C99 types when available. This could fix a compilation issue reported at http://www.libnfc.org/community/post/770
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0610be25c
commit
e2e6c6cacc
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ typedef struct {
|
||||||
} usb_spec_t;
|
} usb_spec_t;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
typedef struct {
|
typedef struct {
|
||||||
u_int16_t idVendor;
|
uint16_t idVendor;
|
||||||
u_int16_t idProduct;
|
uint16_t idProduct;
|
||||||
} usb_candidate_t;
|
} usb_candidate_t;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
nfc_device_t* pn53x_usb_connect(const nfc_device_desc_t* pndd,const char * target_name, int target_chip);
|
nfc_device_t* pn53x_usb_connect(const nfc_device_desc_t* pndd,const char * target_name, int target_chip);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue