use a new way to handle drivers
use absolute include path instead of relative ones
move some nfc_device_t members in a better place
nfc_device_t now embeddeds driver data and chip data pointers (useful to be more generic)
use more readable variables instead of strange coding convention
move PRINT_HEX macro into nfc-internal.h
silent warnings with more strict CFLAGS
chips/pn53x: use the powerful C99 writing to construct PN53x commands
chips/pn53x: remove almost all memcpy()
chips/pn53x: WriteRegister, ReadRegister and SetParameters command wrappers are correctly named
chips/pn53x: introduce chip state (SLEEP, NORMAL or EXECUTE)
chips/pn53x: add SAMConfiguration command wrapper (need to be improved)
chips/pn53x: remove almost all const arrays
chips/pn53x: use human readable defines for commands instead of hex values
chips/pn53x: in debug mode, the PN53x command is shown in human-readable string, awesome isn't it? ;-)
drivers: split transceive() into send() and receive() to be able to handle more cases (differed replies, abort commands, etc) later
drivers: use a const structure of functions instead of -dirty- callbacks array
drivers/pn532_uart: major improvement of UART handling
drivers/pn532_uart: check PN53x frames when received
buses/uart: receive() is now based on expected bytes instead of calculated timeouts..
buses/uart: use a smart way to determine available ports on POSIX systems (tested on Linux and FreeBSD)
Always use nfc_initiator_transceive_bytes(). If you where using advanced
features and already relying on nfc_initiator_transceive_bytes(), then your
code has to be updated to unset the NDO_EASY_FRAMING option. See an example of
such a change in the libfreefare's repository:
http://code.google.com/p/nfc-tools/source/detail?r=566
Updates issue 106
Status: Feedback
Romuald: I am not sure about the option enum values. I took 0x02 thinking it
would not hurt but am not really sure about that because I can see many 'holes'
in the sequence.
In r509, a direct call to pn53x_transceive() was changed into a call to nfc_initiator_transceive_dep_bytes() which is part of the public API. The command to send was updated accordingly, but the code that extracts the response have not.
Update issue 98
This should fix the problem: because the response was not the expected length, the actual card data was not copied to the buffer, so it was always the same 16 uninitialized bytes that where returned for any block.
PR: Issue 98
Submitted by: zamby.ing
Pointy hat to: me
